Because Obama said this:
Now, I don’t think that “mental distress” qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term..
Yesterday I said this:
It is not liberals who do this. It is not our rockstar nominee who does this. It is a duplicitous, wolf in sheeps clothing. He may have said that “going forward, some of you may decide that my FISA position is a deal breaker, ” but no sir. The deal breaker is just you. Your lying, reactionary, double-speaking, fork-tounge demagoguery-wielding self.
Today he says this:
I don’t think that is how it has been interpreted. My only point is that in an area like partial-birth abortion having a mental, having a health exception can be defined rigorously. It can be defined through physical health, It can be defined by serious clinical mental-health diseases. It is not just a matter of feeling blue. I don’t think that’s how pro-choice folks have interpreted it. I don’t think that’s how the courts have interpreted it and I think that’s important to emphasize and understand.”
Today I say this:
I take the mean names I called him back.*
*I would have done this anyway. It’s not nice to call people names. I still think Hillary Clinton would have been a better choice now, but hindsight is 20/20.
And if you were wondering, I will vote for Obama, even if I call him names, he’s our nominee.
Add New Comment
Viewing 2 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment